0.06/0.11	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.06/0.11	% Command    : run_E %s %d THM
0.11/0.32	% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
0.11/0.32	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.11/0.32	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.11/0.32	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.11/0.32	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.11/0.32	% CPULimit   : 960
0.11/0.32	% WCLimit    : 120
0.11/0.32	% DateTime   : Tue Aug  9 05:30:41 EDT 2022
0.11/0.32	% CPUTime    : 
0.16/0.43	Running higher-order on 8 cores theorem proving
0.16/0.43	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=120 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.16/0.43	# Version: 3.0pre003-ho
0.16/0.44	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSLSSSSSNSSA.
0.16/0.44	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.16/0.44	# Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 600s (5) cores
0.16/0.44	# Starting ehoh_best_sine_rwall with 120s (1) cores
0.16/0.44	# Starting sh5l with 120s (1) cores
0.16/0.44	# Starting new_bool_3 with 120s (1) cores
0.16/0.44	# ho_unfolding_3 with pid 26898 completed with status 0
0.16/0.44	# Result found by ho_unfolding_3
0.16/0.44	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSLSSSSSNSSA.
0.16/0.44	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.16/0.44	# Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 600s (5) cores
0.16/0.44	# No SInE strategy applied
0.16/0.44	# Search class: HGHNF-FFSF00-SSSFFMBN
0.16/0.44	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
0.16/0.44	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 325s (1) cores
0.16/0.44	# Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 61s (1) cores
0.16/0.44	# Starting sh2lt with 55s (1) cores
0.16/0.44	# Starting sh2l with 55s (1) cores
0.16/0.44	# Starting ehoh_best_sine_rwall with 55s (1) cores
0.16/0.44	# ho_unfolding_3 with pid 26906 completed with status 0
0.16/0.44	# Result found by ho_unfolding_3
0.16/0.44	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSLSSSSSNSSA.
0.16/0.44	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.16/0.44	# Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 600s (5) cores
0.16/0.44	# No SInE strategy applied
0.16/0.44	# Search class: HGHNF-FFSF00-SSSFFMBN
0.16/0.44	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
0.16/0.44	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 325s (1) cores
0.16/0.44	# Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 61s (1) cores
0.16/0.44	# Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.16/0.44	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.16/0.44	
0.16/0.44	# Proof found!
0.16/0.44	# SZS status Theorem
0.16/0.44	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.16/0.44	thf(decl_22, type, cB: $o).
0.16/0.44	thf(decl_23, type, cA: $o).
0.16/0.44	thf(cTHM505, conjecture, ((((cA)<=>(cB))|![X1:$o > $o]:(((X1 @ ((cB)))<=(X1 @ ((cA))))))=>((cA)<=>(cB))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', cTHM505)).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~(((((cA)<=>(cB))|![X1:$o > $o]:((((~(cA)|(X1 @ $true))&((cA)|(X1 @ $false)))=>((~(cB)|(X1 @ $true))&((cB)|(X1 @ $false))))))=>((cA)<=>(cB)))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM505])])])).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ![X3:$o > $o]:(((((((~(cB)|(X3 @ $true)|(~(cA)|(cA))|(~(cA)|(cB)))&((cB)|(X3 @ $false)|(~(cA)|(cA))|(~(cA)|(cB))))&((~(cB)|(X3 @ $true)|(~(X3 @ $false)|(cA))|(~(cA)|(cB)))&((cB)|(X3 @ $false)|(~(X3 @ $false)|(cA))|(~(cA)|(cB)))))&(((~(cB)|(X3 @ $true)|(~(cA)|~(X3 @ $true))|(~(cA)|(cB)))&((cB)|(X3 @ $false)|(~(cA)|~(X3 @ $true))|(~(cA)|(cB))))&((~(cB)|(X3 @ $true)|(~(X3 @ $false)|~(X3 @ $true))|(~(cA)|(cB)))&((cB)|(X3 @ $false)|(~(X3 @ $false)|~(X3 @ $true))|(~(cA)|(cB))))))&((((~(cB)|(X3 @ $true)|(~(cA)|(cA))|(~(cB)|(cA)))&((cB)|(X3 @ $false)|(~(cA)|(cA))|(~(cB)|(cA))))&((~(cB)|(X3 @ $true)|(~(X3 @ $false)|(cA))|(~(cB)|(cA)))&((cB)|(X3 @ $false)|(~(X3 @ $false)|(cA))|(~(cB)|(cA)))))&(((~(cB)|(X3 @ $true)|(~(cA)|~(X3 @ $true))|(~(cB)|(cA)))&((cB)|(X3 @ $false)|(~(cA)|~(X3 @ $true))|(~(cB)|(cA))))&((~(cB)|(X3 @ $true)|(~(X3 @ $false)|~(X3 @ $true))|(~(cB)|(cA)))&((cB)|(X3 @ $false)|(~(X3 @ $false)|~(X3 @ $true))|(~(cB)|(cA)))))))&((~(cA)|~(cB))&((cA)|(cB))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$o > $o]:(((X1 @ (($true)))|(cA)|(cA)|~((cB))|~((X1 @ (~($true))))|~((cB)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$o > $o]:(((cA)|(X1 @ (($true)))|~((cB))|~((X1 @ (~($true)))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ((cA)|(cB)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$o > $o]:(((cB)|(X1 @ (~($true)))|(cB)|~((cA))|~((X1 @ (($true))))|~((cA)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$o > $o]:(((X1 @ (($true)))|(cA)|~((X1 @ (~($true)))))), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_4, c_0_5])).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$o > $o]:(((cB)|(X1 @ (~($true)))|~((cA))|~((X1 @ (($true)))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, (~((cA))|~((cB))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, (cA), inference(eliminate_leibniz_eq,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[])]), c_0_7])).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$o > $o]:(((X1 @ (~($true)))|(cB)|~((X1 @ (($true)))))), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_5])).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ~((cB)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9, c_0_10])])).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$o > $o]:(((X1 @ (~($true)))|~((X1 @ (($true)))))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_12])).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(eliminate_leibniz_eq,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[])]), c_0_13]), ['proof']).
0.16/0.44	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.16/0.44	# Parsed axioms                        : 3
0.16/0.44	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
0.16/0.44	# Initial clauses                      : 20
0.16/0.44	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 16
0.16/0.44	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 4
0.16/0.44	# Processed clauses                    : 11
0.16/0.44	# ...of these trivial                  : 1
0.16/0.44	# ...subsumed                          : 0
0.16/0.44	# ...remaining for further processing  : 10
0.16/0.44	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.16/0.44	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.16/0.44	# Backward-subsumed                    : 0
0.16/0.44	# Backward-rewritten                   : 3
0.16/0.44	# Generated clauses                    : 5
0.16/0.44	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3
0.16/0.44	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.16/0.44	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 2
0.16/0.44	# Paramodulations                      : 1
0.16/0.44	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.16/0.44	# NegExts                              : 0
0.16/0.44	# Equation resolutions                 : 0
0.16/0.44	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.16/0.44	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.16/0.44	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.16/0.44	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.16/0.44	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.16/0.44	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.16/0.44	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.16/0.44	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.16/0.44	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.16/0.44	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.16/0.44	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.16/0.44	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.16/0.44	# Current number of processed clauses  : 3
0.16/0.44	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 1
0.16/0.44	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.16/0.44	#    Negative unit clauses             : 1
0.16/0.44	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1
0.16/0.44	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
0.16/0.44	# ...number of literals in the above   : 0
0.16/0.44	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.16/0.44	# Current number of archived clauses   : 7
0.16/0.44	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2
0.16/0.44	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
0.16/0.44	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 2
0.16/0.44	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
0.16/0.44	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.16/0.44	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
0.16/0.44	# BW rewrite match successes           : 1
0.16/0.44	# Condensation attempts                : 12
0.16/0.44	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.16/0.44	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 960
0.16/0.44	
0.16/0.44	# -------------------------------------------------
0.16/0.44	# User time                : 0.001 s
0.16/0.44	# System time              : 0.004 s
0.16/0.44	# Total time               : 0.005 s
0.16/0.44	# Maximum resident set size: 1788 pages
0.16/0.44	
0.16/0.44	# -------------------------------------------------
0.16/0.44	# User time                : 0.007 s
0.16/0.44	# System time              : 0.008 s
0.16/0.44	# Total time               : 0.015 s
0.16/0.44	# Maximum resident set size: 1708 pages
0.16/0.44	EOF